Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f2(g1(X), Y) -> f2(X, f2(g1(X), Y))

Q is empty.


QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f2(g1(X), Y) -> f2(X, f2(g1(X), Y))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F2(g1(X), Y) -> F2(X, f2(g1(X), Y))
F2(g1(X), Y) -> F2(g1(X), Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f2(g1(X), Y) -> f2(X, f2(g1(X), Y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
QDP
      ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F2(g1(X), Y) -> F2(X, f2(g1(X), Y))
F2(g1(X), Y) -> F2(g1(X), Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f2(g1(X), Y) -> f2(X, f2(g1(X), Y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


F2(g1(X), Y) -> F2(X, f2(g1(X), Y))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

F2(g1(X), Y) -> F2(g1(X), Y)
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [17,21] with Interpretation:

POL( g1(x1) ) = 2x1 + 3


POL( F2(x1, x2) ) = max{0, 2x1 - 2}


POL( f2(x1, x2) ) = max{0, -2}



The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ QDPOrderProof
QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F2(g1(X), Y) -> F2(g1(X), Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f2(g1(X), Y) -> f2(X, f2(g1(X), Y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.